Open Journal Systems

Decision-making under Market Indeterminacy

Shi Yun(School of Business Administration, Northeastern University)

Abstract

The Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH) is the focusing topic in the past 50 years of financial market researches. Many empirical studies are then provided that want to test EMH but have no consensus. The perception of EMH determines the attitude and strategy of participants and regulators in financial market. One perception of EMH argues that investors’ behavior of seeking abnormal profits and arbitrage drives prices to their ‘‘correct’’ value. Investigating the “correct” value derives the concept of “market indeterminacy”. It means the inability to determine whether stock prices are efficient or inefficient. Market indeterminacy pervades stock markets because “correct” prices are unknown because of imperfect information and model sensitivity. Market indeterminacy makes arbitrage risky and makes event studies unreliable in some policy and litigation applications. The concept of market efficiency is needed to be re-recognized considering the mechanism of price formation. In order to further research and practice in law and financial market, there needs a view from the “jumping together” of disparate disciplines. Adaptive Markets Hypothesis(AMH) that using the evolutionary principles in financial market is a new viewpoint oncognitive decision and deserves to be paid more attention to.

Keywords

Decision-making; Market indeterminacy; EMH; Adaptive markets hypothesis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Eugene F. Fama, Market Efficiency, Long-term Returns, and Behavioral Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, 1998(49):283-306.

Jay R. Ritter, Behavioral Finance, Pacific-basin Finance Journal, 2003 (11) :429-437.

Andrei Shleifer, Inefficient Markets—an Introduction to Behavioral Finance, Press of RENMIN University of China ,2003:5-23.

Wu Fulong, Zeng Yong, Tang Xiaowo, Herding Theories and Its Realistic Significance to Chinese Stock Market, Forecasting,2003,22(2):62-68.

Luo Yan, Zeng Yong, Tang Xiaowo, An Overview of Overreaction Theory in Security Market, Forecasting,2003,22(3):72-75.

Edgar E. Peters, Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets, Press of Economic Science, 1999.

Zhuang Xintian, Huang Xiaoyuan, Sha Yanli, Research on the Fractal Structure in the Chinese Stock Market, Physica A, 2004 (333):293-305.

Andrew W. Lo, Reconciling Efficient Markets with Behavioral Finance: The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis, Journal of Investment Consulting ,Vol. 7, No. 2 (2005): 21-44.

Andrew W. Lo, Adaptive Markets and the New World Order, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 68, No.2 (2012): 18-29.

Andrew W. Lo, Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.

Hasanhodzic, Jasmina, Andrew W. Lo, and Emanuele Viola, What Do Humans Perceive in Asset Returns? Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 45, No. 4 (2019): 49-60.

Liu Huangsong, The Theory of the Stock Intrinsic Value and the Bubble of China’s Stock Market, Economic Studies, 2005(2):45-53.

Rao Yulei, Liu Dafeng, Behavioral Finance, Press of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2003:24-30 (in Chinese).

Paul Asquith, Michael B. Mikhail, Andrea S. Au, Information Content Of Equity Analyst Reports, Journal of Financial Economics, 2005,75(2): 245-282.



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26549/jfr.v5i2.6910

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2021 yun shi Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
  • :+65-98550280 QQ:2249355960 :contact@s-p.sg