Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Educational Theory and Management publishes original research, reviews, and scholarly practice papers in educational theory, curriculum and instruction, educational management, teacher education, higher education, and education policy. The journal emphasizes rigorous study design, transparent methods, sound evidence, and reproducibility, and welcomes high-quality submissions from diverse regions and disciplines.

 

Section Policies

Editorial

Editorial reflects the opinion of an Editorial Board member or staff for particular Journal highlighting recent changes, concerned issues or announcements in relevance to the journal. This may include editorial management and policies.

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Article

Case report is a detailed description on rare diseases, novel occurrences, unusual indication or symptoms of a disease, unreported studies or unexpected events observed in a patient during the course of treatment. The study should highlight and report new cases in diagnosis of emerging diseases or specify variations and associations with new diseases. Case report should contain educational values and emphasize on the need of amendments to usual practices and approaches in the field. Case reports should comprise different findings with updated review on previous cases and investigation in the field. There should not be any preventive and therapeutic intrusions in the Case reports from the findings since they need more confirmed evidences.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Commentary

Commentary is short account commissioned by the Editorial board and call for attention on the current issues confined to a particular subject area while sometimes unsolicited articles are accepted from contemporary scientists or experts in the field. The context is to analyze the issues of interest to readers or a discussion on current research and recently published articles in the Journal. Commentaries may also include editorial opinion relevant to scope of the Journal and discuss external implications such as new technology, grant applications, peer reviewing process on research.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Correspondence Article

Correspondence article is letter addressed to the Editor with a short comment on topical issues or reader’s reaction corresponding to an informal publication previously published in the journal. Usually correspondences will not be peer reviewed and should not contain technical comments on research articles or principal research data.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Database Article

Database article should contain vast information made available to wide utility, accessibility for the retrieval of data.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mini-review

Mini-review is summarized descriptions based on one or more recent findings and significant developments at particular subject area of research considering the Journal’s scope. It is usually commissioned to create interest on the work and warrant further commentaries on the published articles. Maximum length is 2500 words.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Original Research Article

Original research article should contain completely new principal research testifying major contributions to the field. The study should represent new findings or discoveries in a subject area that were not published before. The report may contain significant findings, methodology importance and considerable evidence to the conclusions.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Perspective Article

Perspective article describes new or potentially unconventional point-of-views on existing clinical observations.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review Article

Review article is summarized descriptions of recent findings and significant developments at particular subject area of research considering the Journal’s scope. They should include critical assessments of novel technologies, evaluation of subject advancement, elucidate unresolved questions, comparative analysis with a substantial coverage of previous works and highlight future prospects. Although there are no restrictions with the length and content of a review, authors should consider drawing reader’s attention and interest with quality information.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Short Report

Short report is a helpful description on particular area of research confirming the results from previously published articles. The presentation should be in a way of extension to the previous research work with confirmatory results and evidences on negative results, clinical studies or even patients from a same family. Short report should provide the advancement in control to previous work. The basis and motivation for the work submitted as short report should be acknowledged.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Academic Communication

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Theoretical Forefront

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Teaching Research

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Management Practice

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Research Article

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts are normally evaluated through double-blind peer review by at least two experts in the relevant field. The editorial office considers the reviews, scholarly quality, originality, and publication ethics; the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief or an authorised editor.

 

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to all published content in support of the principle that making research freely available promotes global knowledge exchange.

 

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts are normally evaluated through double-blind peer review by at least two experts in the relevant field. The editorial office considers the reviews, scholarly quality, originality, and publication ethics; the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief or an authorised editor.

 

Publication Ethics

The journal follows recognised publication-ethics principles and requires authors, reviewers, and editors to report research, conflicts of interest, and misconduct honestly.