The Scale and Structure of Funding Expenditures for China’s First-class Universities

Zhixin Zhou(Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University)

Abstract

Adequate funding is identified as a crucial factor in ensuring the success of these universities, impacting talent cultivation, scientific research, and social services. Since the 1990s, China has launched several key projects to enhance the development of its first universities and aimed at elevating these institutions to world-class status. Using data from 34 first-class universities in China from 2014 to 2022, this study analyzes the characteristics and differences in expenditure. It employs an independent sample t-test model to compare the C9 League universities with other first-class universities. The findings reveal significant gaps in total expenditure and varying priorities in expenditure categories, with education being the dominant expenditure item. The study concludes with suggestions for optimizing the efficiency of fund utilization to support the development of world-class universities in China.

Keywords

University funding; Higher education; First-class universities; China

References

Martin Trow. Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education[M]. Berkeley: McGraw-Hill, 1973.4.

Geiger R L. Politics, markets, and university costs: Financing universities in the current era[J]. 2000.

Blume-Kohout M E, Kumar K B, Sood N. Federal life sciences funding and university R&D[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009.

UC Berkeley. Sponsored Projects Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2003-2012[R]. UC Berkeley Research Administration and Compliance Office, 2003-2012.

Dearden L, Goodman A, Wyness G. Higher education finance in the UK[J]. Fiscal Studies, 2012, 33(1): 73-105.

Christiana O O. Modes of funding Nigerian Universities and the implications on performance[J]. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 2011, 7(4): 75-82.

Just R E, Huffman W E. The economics of universities in a new age of funding options[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(7): 1102-1116.

Pittman J S. Student services and auxiliary enterprises[J]. New Directions for Student Services, 2012, 2012(137): 29-39.

Ota H. Japanese universities’ strategic approach to internationalization: Accomplishments and challenges[M]//Emerging international dimensions in East Asian higher education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014: 227-252.

Rolfe H. University strategy in an age of uncertainty: the effect of higher education funding on old and new universities[J]. Higher Education Quarterly, 2003, 57(1): 24-47.

Wassily Leontief. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1936,18(3):105-125.

Solow,R.M., 1998. Rereading the Structure of the American Economy, Economic Systems Research, 10(4):299-306.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26549/jfr.v8i1.18887