The Role of Mathematics in STEAM Education under the “Double Reduction” Policy

Wei Wang(Capital Normal University，China)
Qi Li(Capital Normal University，China)

Abstract

This essay delves into the pivotal role of mathematics within the context of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) education under China's "Double Reduction" policy. Amidst a shifting global education landscape that emphasizes holistic growth, policies such as the "Double Reduction" strategy underscore the significance of well-rounded development alongside academic excellence. By advocating for a balanced approach to education, the policy resonates with the principles of STEAM education, which seeks to cultivate versatile and innovative individuals. Mathematics, acting as a unifying force, connects disparate STEAM disciplines, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and preparing students to thrive in a rapidly evolving, technology-driven world. This essay provides an in-depth exploration of the multifaceted role of mathematics in STEAM education, drawing on specific cases and scholarly references to highlight its contributions to creativity, critical thinking, and holistic development.

Keywords

Mathematics; STEAM education; “Double Reduction” Policy, Interdisciplinary collaboration, Creativity; Innovation; Holistic learning; Technology integration

References

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. National Academies Press.

Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play. MIT Press.

Shen, W., & Norqvist, M. (2020). Creativity and its roles in education—A literature review. Creativity Research Journal, 32(2):103-115.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. National Academies Press.

UNESCO. (2015). Quality Physical Education (QPE) Guidelines for Policy-Makers. UNESCO.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1):38-43.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2):109-121.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26549/jetm.v7i2.13892