What does Bourdieu Mean by the ‘Habitus’ and What Implications does This Idea Have for English Language Teaching in China?: Using Bourdieu: Introducing Habitus, Field and Capital

Shuxin Wang(School of Humanities and Arts, Wuhan University of Communication)

Abstract

Habitus remains an ambiguous and cryptic concept, triggering drastic debate not only in sociology and anthropology but also in culture studies and literary criticism. The topic has been cited by a range of writers, notably Mauss, Husserl and Bourdieu. Even Bourdieu did not provide a clear, authoritative or coherent definition of the term in his work. Due to the fact that habitus plays an indispensable part of social constructionism, which defines our understanding of the world. It is necessary for parents, schools and the government to learn about this concept, and utilize it to guide their education practice and policy enactment. This essay will explore the theoretical concept of “habitus” and its interrelationship with “field” and “capital”. Then discuss the wide disparity in different social groups, in terms of habitus and capital in China. Followed by an analysis of the imbalances in Chinese rural and urban schools respectively, in the field of English language teaching. It aims to help readers better understand the poor performance of students who come from less advantageous social groups in language learning, rather than attributing their failure to their individual defects. The essay will also introduce the 2003 English curriculum reform, illustrate the current status of its implementation in various family upbringing and school locations and put forward some feasible proposals for parents, teachers, students and government to promote social equity in English language teaching in China.

Keywords

Bourdieu; Habitu; Teachin; Culture

References

Crossley, N., 2013. Habit and habitus. Body & Society.19(2–3), 136–161.

Lizardo, O., 2004. The cognitive origins of Bourdieu’s habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 34(4), 375–401.

Maton, K., 2014. Habitus. Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge: London. pp. 60–76.

Jorgensen, R., Gates, P., Roper, V., 2014. Structural exclusion through school mathematics: Using Bourdieu to understand mathematics as a social practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 87(2), 221–239.

Burnard, P., Trulsson, Y.H., 2016. Bourdieu applied in the analysis of conservatoire learning cultures. Bourdieu and the sociology of music education. Routledge: London. pp. 119–132.

Thomson, P., 2014. Field. Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge: London. pp. 77–92.

Mu, G.M., Jia, N., 2016. Rural dispositions of floating children within the field of Beijing schools: can disadvantaged rural habitus turn into recognised cultural capital?. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 37(3), 408–426.

McKay, L.C., 2016. Educational change in China and the organization of teacher-student interaction in urban and rural TEFL classrooms [Ph.D. thesis]. San Diego: San Diego State University.

Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., 2002. English language teaching in China: A bridge to the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 22(2), 53–64.

Hu, G., 2003. English language teaching in China: Regional differences and contributing factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 24(4), 290–318.

Sun, L., 2012. Family factors affecting English basic education and related countermeasures——An empirical study based on six children of H University affiliated middle school. Journal of Yibin University. (4), 115–118.

Cortazzi, M., Jin, L., 1996. Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. Society and the Language Classroom. 169(206), 42.

Wu, Y., 2008. Cultural capital, the state, and educational inequality in China, 1949–1996. Sociological Perspectives. 51(1), 201–227.

Wang, W., Lam, A.S., 2009. The English language curriculum for senior secondary school in China: Its evolution from 1949. RELC Journal. 40(1), 65–82.

Yulia, A., 2013. Linking family background and home language with english reading comprehension amog Bi/Multilinguals [Ph.D.thesis]. College Station:Texas A&M University.

Gou, J., 2017. Study on the difference between urban and rural areas in junior school English teaching. Overseas English. (14), 26–28.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26549/jetm.v8i1.14325